Recruiters don't burn out on candidates. They burn out on write-ups.
Sourcing is the job. The rest, summaries written from scratch, interview scheduling ping-pong, ATS records that decay the moment nobody's looking, clients chasing status by email, is overhead that scales with every open role and never places anyone.
The hours between sourcing and placing
Every step here sits between a good candidate and a signed offer, and every one is manual.
Write-ups from scratch
Candidate summaries assembled by hand from calls, notes, and resumes, an hour each, dozens per week.
Scheduling ping-pong
Interview coordination running through email threads and phone tag across candidates, clients, and time zones.
ATS decay
Records updated when someone remembers, so search returns stale candidates and reporting can't be trusted.
Status chasing
Clients emailing 'any update?' because pipeline status lives in a recruiter's head, not a system they can see.
Plumbing between your calls, your ATS, and your clients
Keep the ATS you have. We automate what your recruiters retype into it.
Notes → summary drafts
Call notes and resumes become standardized candidate summaries for recruiters to edit, not author from a blank page.
Self-serve interviews
Candidates and clients book against real availability, the back-and-forth disappears, the calendar fills itself.
An ATS that updates itself
Stage changes, notes, and status flow into the ATS as work happens, and clients see progress without asking.
Pick the step that slows every placement
Tell us the bottleneck. We'll tell you straight whether it's worth automating, and what it would take.
See what we'd automate first →